|
Retrogaming Times Monthly |
| Issue #14 - July 2005 |
|
Table of Contents |
|
| 01. | Press Fire to Start |
| 02. | Syntax Era |
| 03. | The Many Faces of . . . Targ/Crossfire |
| 04. | ColecoNation |
| 05. | The Titles of Tengen |
| 06. | Musings of a Spectrum Owner |
| 07. | The TI-99/4 Arcade |
| 08. | Interview With Denial Creator Jeff Daniels |
| 09. | The Thrill of Defeat |
| 10. | Game Over |
| Press Fire to Start |
| by Adam King |
Welcome to another issue of Retrogaming Times Monthly. Featuring another bountiful buffet of retrogaming goodness. We have some fairly large articles this month, so let's not waste any more time and dive right in.
Before we begin I should tell you that becuase of time and space constraints, there's no Retrogaming Commercial Vault this month but it will return next month. I also have a couple of artiles that have been pushed back as well.
| Syntax Era: Game On! USA |
| by Scott Jacobi |
File this one under "the coolest video game mag you probably didn't read."
Game On! USA's publishing cycle occurs considerably later than any of the other magazines I have ever covered for RTGM. 1996 to be precise, making it new enough to possibly not considered retro. Bare with me though, this one is definitely worth examining. So much so that I couldn't wait to get to it. The subtitle for the magazine was "The Magazine of Electronic Manga Gaming." If that doesn't scream niche market, I don't know what does. However, don't forget that in 1996, the video game market was still largely driven by Japanese concepts. Capcom's Street Fighting license was still in its hey-day, while the Neo-Geo market was following close behind. The light was beginning to fade for the 16 bit generation while it was only just beginning to shine for their 32-bit (and 64-bit in Nintendo's case) replacements. The American Sony marketing machine would slowly morph the video game market landscape from a Japanese dominated one into the more American contributed market that we see today, but in '96, it's safe to say that that hadn't happened yet.
| ColecoNation |
| by Nathan Kozlowski |
Call me close-minded, uninformed, out-dated, or just plain crazy, but I think that the ColecoVision is the champ. I realize that it wasn't the first, the most popular, or the most powerful. I'm aware that it pales in comparison to the technological marvels of today. However, all of this doesn't matter, because the CV is the best. What's my proof? Well, I really don't have any, because my conviction comes more from a psychological then a logical source. You must understand. I've been diagnosed as a Coleco-centric.
This month I will be reviewing Sky Jaguar, a top-down shooter brought to us by Opcode Games. While this is not their most recent release, it’s the game I’ve been playing the most frequently and thus caught my attention. Sky Jaguar was initially released in March 2004 at PhillyClassic 5. The game uses the joystick controller and is for one player. The cartridge, with a rom size of 24K, was programmed by Eduardo Mello. The packaging was designed by Dale Crum and the manual text was by Jess Ragan. You can get it directly from Opcode for $22 (+ship).
![]() |
| Screen courtesy of Opcode Games |
I hope you enjoyed the maiden voyage of ColecoNation as much as I did writing it. My mission is to make ColecoNation as interesting, extensive, and accurate as possible so email me with any questions, suggestions, or comments you might have about the column. Thanks for paying attention and not misbehaving, you all get gold stars for the day.
| The Many Faces of . . . Targ (Actually, Crossfire) |
| by Alan Hewston |
This month we celebrate the 25th anniversary of the arcade game “Targ”. But there is a twist to this month’s Many Faces. This 1980 Exidy title was never officially released to any classic home systems, so we’ll do the next best thing, and review “Crossfire”, a game somewhat similar to “Targ” and just as addictive. Let’s begin with some background on Targ but ultimately focus on Crossfire. First, there was Targ, the arcade game, then its sequel “Spectar”, then the Atari 2600 port of Targ by CBS, then onto 2600 “Universal Chaos”, and finally Crossfire - by Sierra Online Systems.
![]() |
| Targ arcade screen |
![]() |
| Spectar arcade screen |
Atari 2600 Targ was licensed to CBS and targeted for a September 1983 release, showing up in catalogs and at the ’83 CES. Despite having completed the programming, the great videogame crash and declining sales likely prevented its release. Along came Telegames, who bought out and/or otherwise ended up with the CBS stock (and this prototype), made some graphical changes (like eliminating the CBS logo) and released it under a new name, “Universal Chaos”. The origins of Universal Chaos were not confirmed by our VG community until recently, when Digital Press team member, Scott Silphen found the missing link, a CBS Targ prototype, which he shared at the 2004 CGE. A comparison of the game codes revealed that besides the graphics changes, they are nearly identical, with the only other difference being the (earlier) CBS prototype did not have the Spectar Smuggler active in the game, but it was programmed in. For the purposes of our 2600 review, we’ll use the fully functional “Universal Chaos” ROM. An exercise for our readers is to play both versions via emulation and tell us if there are any other subtle changes.
Finally we come to “Crossfire”, which you may have heard referred to as an unlicensed, home port of Targ. It is very similar at a glance, but I think you’ll agree that Crossfire is pretty much a unique game, and most likely Sierra Online did as well. Even if it had its roots as Targ, it was changed significantly, to eliminate any risk of a lawsuit. Specifically, in Targ, all enemies are present and on the streets in pursuit of you at all times. In Crossfire there are 11 sets of 4 enemies by location, which must deploy before they pursuit you. In Targ, no enemies can fire weapons at you, but they do early and often in Crossfire. In Targ, you can only fire the direction you are moving in, but in Crossfire you can move one direction while simultaneously firing in another. The name says it all – as you are caught in the crossfire.
Home Version Similarities in Crossfire: Except those in <> all home versions have: a demo; a pause <AP2>, bonus ship/life every 5k <Vic 20 ? AP2 ?>; a 6 X 5 city block playfield (grid) that you and the enemies traverse; begin each round/life on the lower right side of the screen with your maximum allotment of missiles, which is 35 for round one; in subsequent rounds your maximum is decreased by 5 per round until round 5 where you begin with 15; any time in the game that you have 10 remaining, an icon appears at a random intersection which must be ran over - as the only means to re-supply your missiles; the enemies all begin off the grid and behind the buildings, 3 along the left edge, 6 along the top edge, and 2 along the (upper) right edge of the screen; these 11 enemy starting locations or encampments will produce 4 enemy types throughout each round, 1 emerging at a time, always in the same sequence, but only one for each encampment can be seen or is active at a time; before they can emerge onto the streets, they first move one step left/right or up/down - so that they are now at the end of a row or column; once there, they fire at you, or be fired upon by you, but they may also move right back into hiding; usually they sit or play hide and seek for a few seconds before emerging, but will spend less time doing so as the rounds increase; once onto the playfield they keep moving non-stop chasing you – until they are eliminated; as in Targ, these enemies know where you are and are always closing in, but fortunately they’re not as fast as you; only after the current enemy from any encampment has been destroyed will the next type in sequence be allowed to appear – eventually all 4 types are deployed; all 11 enemy ships (i.e. from the 11 encampments) can be active, firing and/or moving simultaneously, but typically no more than 8 are in motion at once; all versions allow 6 or more enemy shots simultaneously; you can only fire one shot <Vic 20 (6 can be fired)> at a time, until it hits an enemy, or reaches the end of the street; near the very end of each round all remaining enemies (about 8 to 10) will deploy and emerge simultaneously or continue chasing you for an all out assault against you – this continues non-stop, with no delays in deployment or emerging until there are none left, which ends the round; for every 12 missiles you fire, one of 4 bonus items will move from its initial location inside a building - to an adjacent intersection; these bonus items somewhat replace Targ’s Spectar Smugglers, but are not enemies, do not move and are always located in, and show up in sequence from the same 4 (innermost) intersections; they remain in the intersection until 6 <Vic 20 (4)> more shots are fired; if ran over (collected), you score the bonus; those missed go back inside the building, but will eventually come back out again – 12 shots later; the bonus points are 100 for the first one collected and then 200, 400 & 800 if each is collected; points for these are displayed on the screen; if you lose a ship, they are reset – and all 4 will be seen again <Atari 8 bit, does not reset> and you start over again at 100 for the first one; fortunately, if you lose a ship, the rest of the level does not reset, but all active enemies go back to their encampments; each level has the same 44 enemies which get a little faster, fire more frequently and deploy more quickly each round/level. The manuals state that you earn 1000 points upon completing a round, but this is incorrect and does not occur on any version I have played.
Targ: Arcade by Exidy, programmed by ?unknown?
Crossfire: all home versions by Sierra On-line Systems
Sequel to Targ: “Spectar” 1980 by Exidy (arcade) (unknown programmer)
Remake of Crossfire: Commodore 64 – Crossfire version 2 - by Cosmos Design Hannes Sommer 1994.
Rumor Mill: Spectar was planned for the Colecovision – too bad it or Crossfire did not come out.
Disqualified: Atari 2600 (37)
My first reaction (as already noted) was the game was never officially released as Targ, or Crossfire, so we cannot allow it in the medal hunt as Crossfire. But, we’ll do the next best thing, by acknowledging it and giving it some scores - based upon “Universal Chaos” version.
Have Nots: TI-99 (NA)
My first reaction was Online Systems planned for a cart release nut it never happened. I’ve not verified if the ROM image of Crossfire is that of an official Crossfire release i.e. those from diskette or cassette. For now, we will not disqualify it, but hopefully some day we’ll hear more about this port from our TI-99 expert Bryan Roppolo.
Have Nots: Apple ][ (31)
My review is limited as I may not have a final or the official version of this game - there is no menu, no game play choices, and only a cheap looking intro screen where you are told to “hit any key” to begin. Segue: Was it Opus who “hit” any key on his MAC with a sledge hammer back in the late 1980’s Doonesbury? This was the original version of Crossfire, putting it at a disadvantage, which may explain why there is no joystick support. Another possibility is that my disk version is NOT the final or official release, and so there could be a joystick option or other elements missing/disabled. Another possibility is multiple versions, which may be the case on other systems. That is, the instruction manuals for both the Vic 20 & Atari 8 bit mention keyboard commands, but these are inactive on my cart version - regardless if a joystick is plugged in or not. Anyhow, please accept my apologies and consider that these scores would only go up if some features are missing.
Bronze Medal: Vic 20 (39)
My first reaction was there is both a cassette and cartridge version and so there could be more differences (other than the keyboard disabled on the cart version). I did not try (for the first time) to see if I can load any games from tape or disk to my Vic 20. Gameplay is nearly all there (8), with only a few slight differences. But most notably missing is the final onslaught where the remaining enemies all emerge. Bonus items only are very difficult to earn, lasting only 3 or 4 shots, and are then gone. This version is by far the hardest, with the most aggressive firing enemies, and most difficult (on average) location of the re-supply intersection. The action also gets slowed down when too many objects are moving, but overall I still felt that the Addictiveness was enjoyable (8). The pause is toggled via <F7>. To make up for some added difficulty, you can almost fire at will, with as many as 6 shots firing off, in any/all 4 directions. But then again, you’ll need to adjust for this and be careful to not go running out of ammo too fast. The re-supply icon only lasts for a few seconds and then goes away and comes back, but - do not fret. This is just a graphics glitch or limitation because as soon as you run over that spot, regardless if the icon is displayed, you are re-supplied. Your full supply is confirmed by a great graphics feature only found here - a “shots remaining counter”. Overall the Graphics are the worst, (7) but still pretty good and do not detract from playing. There is less detail, less color, less variety and no multi-colored items. The animation is OK, and all enemies can be in motion, but then that may slow the action accordingly. Sound is respectable (6), better than the Apple, but no where near as good as the Gold medal winner (and its musical score). This is actually the best version sans music, being the only one where there are sound effects for shots fired – both by you and the enemy – how can they have overlooked that? The Vic is missing the sound effect when your ammo is re-supplied, but then you see the shots remaining counter reset instead. Controls are perfect (10), but there is a difference here as well. It’s not a problem, but may take some getting used to moving the stick back to re-center and then moving it again for each time you want to move/fire. You cannot just hold it in a direction and fire repeatedly. The cart is semi rare, but also found on cassette and maybe on disk.
Silver Medal: Atari 8 bit (40)
My first reaction was disappointment there is no music. The Sound is still fine (6), with nothing missing and the only version (AFAIK) to add a chime for earning a bonus life. Likewise you (usually) hear an effect when the bonus items are introduced – not found on any other version. Gameplay is solid (8), the best. Addictiveness is very fun (8), with a pause <P>, and the only version where screens change colors (nice!) for each level. Speaking of which, the Graphics are very nice (8), with the color choices, variety and multi-color being the best here. The animation is OK, and details are good enough. The Controls are perfect (10), but again the keyboard option appears to be removed on the cart version. A little difficult to find the cart, but there are probably cassette & disk versions out there too.
Gold Medal: Commodore 64 (41)
Exercise for readers – Try the 1994, C64 remake of Crossfire and see if the enhanced graphics, or any added options make it more fun for you.
Finale: Overall, there is room for improvement on every version, be it adding music, filling out all the effects - like shots fired, or hearing a bonus life earned, or getting a re-supply, adding more graphic detail, color variety, multi-color, increased animation and a shot counter, not to mention a pause, starting level or game play options. And why not add the Spectar differences as options as well. Even so, Crossfire has a good simple charm and challenge to it that I think you’ll find enjoyable on any of these versions. Thanks go to NE Ohio’s Classic Computers and Games organizer Tom MacLaren for helping me with the Apple ][ port, and a couple years back former RT staff writer Fred Wagaman who saved and sold me the Vic 20 cassette version and manual.
Updates and Errata from last month.
Atari 2600 Venture fans should look here for a very nice update / hack that includes the 3rd level in the rotation. Venture 3 – can be downloaded and played courtesy of AtariAge, and hacker ”Batari”
http://www.atariage.com/hack_page.html?SystemID=2600&SoftwareHackID=269.
Come back next month, for a 25th anniversary salute to the Gremlin/Sega arcade game “Carnival”, and its many faces, well actually only 3 (as I need a vacation) on the Atari 2600, Colecovision and Intellivision. Contact Alan Hewston at: Hewston95@NOSPAMstratos.net or visit the Many Faces of site:
http://my.stratos.net/~hewston95/RT/ManyFacesHome.htm.
Everybody likes Ninja games especially those that begin life as a cult arcade classic and one of Sega's most cherished retogaming properties. Well, everyone but me that is. Just so I can get it out of the way I suppose I should make it known that Shinobi is a game I have always disliked. Not to say it's a bad game or the worst of the Tengen ports (I still have to review the Tengen NES port of Toobin' after all) but simply I have never been able to enjoy Shinobi as much as I would have liked. The game has a lot going for it: nice graphics, good music and one of my all time favorite bonus stages however the difficulty ramps up way too quickly. The game turns into an exercise in point A to point B enemy memorization instead of a quick reflexes beat-em-up. I can't begin to imagine the amount of money I must have dropped into the Shinobi machine at the local bowling alley in frustration in my younger days. Still, I'll put all that aside since this is supposed to be a comparison review between the arcade original and Tengen's NES home port.
Shinobi lets the player take the role of a ninja sent by the government to defeat a terrorist band called The Ring of Five. The Ring of Five is headed by five extremely powerful ninja assassins and they have kidnapped the children of the world's leaders. Armed only with an endless supply of shuriken (throwing stars) and skill, you set off to battle the Ring of Five's henchmen and defeat all five of their ninja leaders. The game is composed of twenty levels, four stages of five missions.
"InsaneDavid" also runs a slowly growing gaming site at http://www.classicplastic.net/dvgi Here are some reminiscences of classic gaming in the '80s, from a Spectrum owner's perspective. (I notice that there has not been much written yet for Spectrum owners, but the newsletter is great!)
In the UK, the main two computers of the 80s were the Commodore 64 and Sinclair Spectrum. There was such rivalry at school about whose system was 'best' -- Speccy games 'had great gameplay', whereas (admittedly) the Commodore 64 had better sound, better colours, and 16K more RAM than the Spectrum. But I am a die-hard Speccy fan!
10 LET A$ = "a5f43b651ca12e"
These listings would run to dozens of multi-line paragraphs, spanning many pages! It was extremely hard to work out where you were!
Many commercial games that were written in BASIC anyway would be customisable. Press Shift and <space bar> and 'break' into the running program. This was a common way of playing soccer sim Football Manager.
You would go into the program and alter the team name to be your favourite, and also customise the manager name. You could then type RUN and start the whole game again, with your customisation. Or you could SAVE a copy of the game onto a blank audio tape for yourself (naughty, as this pirates the game!).
10 POKE 32767, 255
This would then load the game (i.e. Jet Set Willy). You would then end up with 255 lives (very handy!).
After taking a break for 2 months I decided to get my act together for July. While reading through some of my past articles and debating on which titles to review this month, I realized there was an obscure arcade conversion done for the TI-99/4A that I never got around to doing. This game is none other than SNK's Munchmobile, which should have been reviewed many months ago but for what ever reason slipped under my radar! Therefore, this month's Arcade is more of a Mix & Match than any set theme just to catch up with some missed review opportunities. In addition to Munchmobile I tossed in Slymoids and Tunnels of Doom. Slymoids is an awesome little side scrolling shoot-em up which definitely deserves more recognition, while Tunnels of Doom is well...Tunnels of Doom (and I mean that in a good way!). Anyway, sit back and enjoy this month's Mix & Match of reviews and have a good Fourth of July!
Slymoids (1983 TI)
Munchmobile (1983 SNK Electronics) - Port of "Munchmobile" (1983 SNK Electronics)
Tunnels of Doom (1982 TI)
My first reaction was this was the first version I played and I still recall many nights playing this one non-stop – gotta play just ONE more game. Gameplay is impressive (8) with all elements in place, and the best demo. Something I hadn’t noticed years ago was that when differing enemy types collide, they will wipe each other out, but no points earned – so better for you to shoot them. This also occurs on the Atari, and likewise, enemies of the same types will not destroy each other. The Addictiveness is the best and is fun to play (8) with all the excitement, plus
Didn’t realize I had an autocorrect spellchecker mistake. I keep misspelling Intellivision, and have been for a while. Sorry about that. I can’t see the forest from the trees.
The Titles of Tengen - Shinobi
by David Lundin, Jr.

Musings of a Spectrum Owner
by Andrew Masters
20 LOAD "JSW"
![]()
The TI-99/4A Arcade: Mix & Match
![]()
by Bryan Roppolo
| Interview with Denial Creator Jeff Daniels |
| by Tonks |
TELL US A LITTLE ABOUT YOURSELF
I'm Jeffrey Daniels, and I started the Denial Website for Commodore Vic 20 enthusiasts. My day job is far from the tech industries. I am a professor at a college in Chicago where I grew up.
CAN YOU GIVE US A LITTLE OF THE HISTORY THAT LEAD TO THE CREATION OF DENIAL?
My father bought the family an Atari VCS at the height of video game popularity. I was too young to play, but I was greatly influenced by watching my older brothers play. I wanted to become a video game designer;
I would draw game ideas on bits of graph paper. Eventually I figured out that a computer was needed to make any of these ideas real games. My dad bought a Vic 20 just for me. It was quite a treasure in my neighborhood for a kid to own his own computer. I loved that machine. It took months to figure out how to use it, but once I developed a love for programming, I never stopped. Years later, as a college student, I still produced programs for the now obsolete Vic. I would go to the library and dig up old copies of
Compute magazine and analyze the type-in programs. After getting into the fan Zine scene, I decided to make a zine/newsletter just for the Vic; someone else out there had to share my obsession. I called the newsletter "Denial". I thought it was funny. Denial is actually the letters of my last name rearranged and a joke on the small readership I expected. One had to be in Denial to be slightly interested in 8bit computers. The Denial newsletter was mostly old pics and my BASIC game programs and only ran for 4 issues. I paid for it all myself on a student budget. There were a handful of subscribers contributing to the costs, but I couldn't afford the postage at some point. Denial died. I was late to the internet, but the access to international Vic users made Denial a viable project again.
DENIAL HAS CERTAINLY BECOME A SUCCESSFUL FORUM. DID YOU EVER BELIEVE YOU WOULD GET MORE THAN A HANDFUL OF MEMBERS?
No. I remember the newsletter went out to about twenty regulars. I didn't imagine that any more
than that would visit my website. At the time, I was only really aware
of Rick Melick's page. The only hint I had to a greater community was
the activity on eBay. I had often been outbid on Vic items. Whoever was
bidding on this stuff had to be interested in discussing it on my
forum.
WHAT ARE SOME OF YOUR PLANS FOR THE FUTURE OF DENIAL?
I hope to develop the front page much more in the next few months. I still need contributions. It would be great to have rare pics and documents. I hope to make it a central resource for the system.
WHY THE VIC 20? WHAT ATTRACTION DOES IT HAVE FOR YOU?
Developing a 3.5k game is like writing a poem. The artful economy of language is irresistible to me. In a week's worth of development time I can produce a simple but meaningful program. My most impressionable moments in video gaming were based around the Atari 2600 and other early 8 bit systems. Games were magical at that time: simple premises, easy learning curves and fun! I wanted to make games as pure as those I first played. The Vic 20 and BASIC programming opened the door, but there's more to it. The large colorful characters and simple interface capture all of the charm of a generation of gaming.
THE VIC 20 WAS ALWAYS A FORGOTTEN SYSTEM, BUT IT NOW SEEMS TO BE GAINING A RENEWED INTEREST. WHY DO YOU THINK THIS IS SO?
The Vic was so quickly overshadowed by the [Commodore] 64 that most collectors returning the world of games will forget its significance. The Vic sold a massive number of units! As Ward Shrake points out in his FAQ, the Vic had more carts produced than many popular systems of that time. This doesn't even include the popular tape medium and untold numbers of user programs. As collectors become more savvy, they are reminded of the VIC 20's important contributions to computers and gaming.
WHAT ARE YOUR THOUGHTS ON SOME OF THE VERY HIGH PRICES VIC 20 GAMES HAVE BEEN GOING FOR ON EBAY?
As collectors grow older, the disposable income of the young and employed will lead to exaggerated prices in all areas of game collecting. I watched a Neo Geo game finish at ten thousand dollars on evil-bay. That
would never happen in the early 90s. The kids who grew up with these games and hold them dear now have real jobs! You can't put a price on childhood memories. The Vic was the first affordable "friendly
computer". Many of us started here and learned how to program here. I expect many more Vic-heads (now upper income programmers) to pop up in the next decade and want their VICs back.
WHAT ARE YOUR FAVOURITE VIC 20 GAMES?
Mine. Nothing beats making and playing your own game. I have a great one in the works. Other than that I
love the first cart I ever owned, Gridrunner. I also love Quakers, Omega Race, Creepy Corridors, Alpha Anxiety, Scare City Motel, Adventure Land, and Big Bad Wolf (in that exact order).
ARE YOU A FAN OF ANY OTHER CLASSIC SYSTEMS? IF SO, WHAT SYSTEMS AND GAMES ARE YOUR OTHER FAVOURITES?
I have a Joust arcade cabinet. It takes up a lot of my time. I know have it wired to a MegaDrive with a cart demo system. I can rotate between six games at a push of a button or by an adjustable timer system. I
love it, but it has me paying attention to the Sega Genesis/ MD scene. I spend a good deal of time overseas where hacking makes for interesting homebrews on this platform. I always come back with great pirate games.
I am still hunting down a few roms. I also enjoy the Atari 2600, Sega Saturn, Dreamcast (I am desperately
seeking games for this one). I recently got into Gameboy advaced because of its emulation ability. I
now have a few VIC games on it. I recently gave up on my more obscure collections: Bally Astrocade, handhelds, Turbo Grafx and Tomy Tutor.
WHAT IS THE FIRST THING THAT COMES TO MIND WHEN YOU THINK OF THE FOLLOWING?
Commodore - I'm not really a Commodore nut. I love the VIC, but never could get into the 64 or later computers.
Jeff Minter - Genius. Gridrunner changed my life. I've always admired his work for the creative storylines and strange nuances more than the coding.
Ward Shrake - An early Denial subscriber and fore-father to our VIC community. At one point in the newletter days of Denial, I thought He, Paul LeBrasse and I were the only VIC collectors in the world.
The Commodore 16 - Never had one, never touched one. I've always wanted to put a Vic in the black C16 case. I thought it would look cool, but now that I hear it may not be physically possible because of the different read ports. I really want one anyway just to see it up close.
Tom Griner - Machine language is beyond me. A million things happening at once.
Emulation - A necessary evil. I love the convenience, but I would hate for someone to try my programs for the first time on this format. Nothing beats the real thing.
Denial - I am constantly amazed at the geniuses who have wandered to my site. We have a great bunch of friendly, helpful and wicked intelligent members. I can't be anything other than optimistic (smile).
| The Thrill Of Defeat: The Video Technology VZ200 |
| by Mark Sabbatini |
Even if you're selling a cheap and tacky product, consumers usually don't want it reminding them they're cheap and tacky. This basic concept constantly got overlooked during home computing's early days, with machines resembling glorified toys flooding and usually making a quick exit from stores. Much of this was due to the success of the tackiest and cheapest machines of all: Sinclar's ZX80, ZX81 and Spectrum. These were the exception because they were the pinnacle of cheapness, possessing a quirky charm like plain-label generic groceries and Ed Wood movies. Once companies started trying to tack on a few extras for a few extra dollars, forget it. Few buyers took seriously machines that were often about six inches square, had tiny rubber keys without spacebars and brittle-looking plastic cases. Customers flocked instead to bargain machines that looked like real computers such as the VIC-20, even though they were often inferior in computing power. A historian would be challenged to name a non-Sinclair bare-bones machine that achieved real success. But the list of failures is plenty long: the Mattel Aquarius, Radio Shack MC-10, Texas Instruments 99/2, Tomy Tutor, Jupiter Ace and others (many of which will get looks in future columns here). Even IBM played a high-end version of the game with its PC Jr., which helped knocked the company from its seemingly unassailable spot on the computer throne.
At the bottom of this food chain is the cheapest home computer with color ever: the Video Technology VZ200.
This computer was a decent price/performance contender when it was introduced in 1982 (I know I'm deviating a bit from the chronological progression of obscure computers in previous columns, now in the late 1970s; I'll return there soon). But being second lowest in price (behind the ZX81) is like being the second-to-last guy picked in the NFL draft. The last guy - known as Mr. Irrelevant - gets a vacation, a photo shoot with models and all kinds of media attention, while nobody remembers the person picked just before him.
Other computers eventually sold for less than the VZ200's $99 retail tag once the price wars of the early '80s got into full swing, but its initial tag was unmatched. It bombed in the U.S., but managed to eek out sales in Germany and Australia, the latter thanks to it being carried widely by Dick Smith Electronics (a store similar to Radio Shack), which sold it at least until 1989. Many of its most dedicated retro fans are there and an exceptional Web site featuring emulators, software and documents is maintained by Jason Oakley at www.vzalive.bangrocks.com/.
I was intrigued by the machine (also sold as the Laser 200), perhaps because it seemed to bear a strong resemblance to my much-loved TRS-80 Color Computer for one-third the cost. This proved to be mostly because they shared the same Motorola 6847 display chip, a 32-column, uppercase-only cost-cutter with 2K of memory than ranked among the lesser options of the era. The guts of the machine were a combination of the best and worst components found in its bargain-bin competitors. The good included a 3.58MHz Z80 processor and 16K of BASIC ROM (twice that of many competitors), and it was large enough (about 11 inches long and six deep) for people to use it comfortably. The negatives included a rubber keyboard with poor response and no spacebar, a slow and unreliable interface for storing programs on cassette tapes, and a number of ROM bugs that triggered system crashes (if a user tried to print something with no printer attached, for example).
As a games machine, it was lacking. The 6K of user RAM wasn't enough for anything in-depth, although a 16K plug-in expansion pack was available (and larger ones up to 64K in subsequent years). The single-voice sound chip had a limited range and - like the Color Computer - brought everything else to a halt while playing. Maximum graphics resolution was 128X64 with four colors, perhaps the lowest of any machine except the black-and-white Sinclairs. At least it supported joysticks.
Overall, the best VZ200 games were roughly equal in quality to first-generation Color Computer titles (or Mattel's Intellivision for those needing a more well-known, if somewhat less accurate, reference point). In other words, just about every machine on American shores could eat it for lunch, especially beyond its few "premier" titles. Virtually all look cheesy and pixilated; when I talk about games having good graphics in the reviews below, it's only in reference to other VZ200 games.
A stronger interest in the VZ200 might have led to better games as programmers pushed the machine to limits its designers might not have intended, much like the Atari 2600. A graphics resolution of 256X192, for example, might have been possible with the built-in chip.
Even so, it's possible to have fun on this machine. Titles such as Hamburger Sam (Burgertime), Dawn Patrol (Choplifter), Space Ram (Targ) and Kamikaze Invaders (an original) are all quality diversions for a newcomer. Others are worthwhile from a historical or quirkiness standpoint, if only because they're so awful they'll make modern gamers appreciate even the worst titles in their collections.
The ratings in the review capsules below are in relation to other VZ200 games. They are in alphabetical order, although I was unable to play some gamers favored by loyalists such as VZ Panik and Asteroids. The remaining games reviewed will be listed next month.
3D Maze (C-)
This will seem seriously lame to anyone acquainted with even the most basic first-person shooters (i.e. Doom), not to mention old-school types used to encountering hazards in mazes (i.e. Wizardry). But for a primitive puzzle game this isn't bad, mostly because you can select the maze size, it moves along speedily and the display provides useful information such as your grid coordinates. Still, it probably won't hold anyone's attention for long, except those too tame to encounter even a mosquito when dungeon crawling.
Airstrip (C)
This is one of those simple games programmed in BASIC that exist for nearly all computers, the sort that can be fun if well-executed. The mission, described more amusingly here than most, is your plane needs a place to land, but unfortunately doing so requires wiping out the city below. Your plane fliers across the screen from left to right, dropping down every time it reaches the edge and "wraps around." Pressing the space key drops bombs on the city below and you must clear out sufficient space to land before hitting the buildings. It's sort of like an upside-down Breakout. This version has 35 skill levels, a limited supply of bombs and occasional "superbomb" capability, all extras from the usual versions. It doesn't have a ton of staying power, but among homebrew games it's one of the better short-term diversions you'll find.
Blackjack (D)
I could see a student in a BASIC programming class submitting this if the assignment required writing a blackjack game, and I can see myself as the teacher giving him/her a slightly above-average grade for implementing the rules and a considerably below-average grade for gameplay. The fact you start with no money is not a good sign, nor is being able to bet any amount and having the computer accept it (and start displaying your winnings/losings in very strange scientific notation when you get into the billions and trillions). The game is entirely played through a series of time-consuming, text-based prompts - no graphics at all. The positives are it understands things like doubling down and insurance, which a number of BASIC games don't. But I still wouldn't recommend it to anyone.
Bust-out (D-)
Breakout may be one of the easiest games to write in any computer language, but that doesn't mean plenty of people don't come out with versions that are inexplicably horrible. This is your typical bedroom BASIC programmer's effort - incredibly slow, lousy oversized graphics, a ton of flicker and a sparse playfield of bricks to hit.
Chess (B+)
I confess I haven't played this extensively enough to judge its value for hardcore players, but for casual fans this offers a lot - albeit a bit slowly. There are six computer skill levels, the ability to modify boards, take back moves, switch sides and make other adjustments. Control is wisely implemented by typing moves with standard notation (i.e. E2-E4) and the graphics are easy to decipher (although the use of red and blue pieces would be a crippling problem for someone with a black-and-white television). Biggest problem - I'm not aware of any way to save a game and using the setup option to resume a game would be time-consuming.
Dawn Patrol (B+)
Wow - Choplifter for the VZ200? After playing a bunch of horrible games I felt sure I was in for a serious letdown reading the in-game instructions, which are amazingly close to one's objectives for the Apple megahit. You rescue hostages from four stations using your helicopter, while dealing with enemy tank and missile attacks by firing missiles and bombs at them. Most of the little touches such as guard towers to avoid and the need to drop off hostages when your chopper gets full are preserved, although it doesn't quite have the full forward/backward flying and firing controls of the original. On most other computers this version would be decidedly subpar (even the official Vic 20 version is better), but on this limited machine it's a breath of fresh air.
Defence Penetrator (C)
In a fair world I'd get the programmer's side of this story. About how, after writing about as good a Scramble clone as one can expect on a VZ200, he/she/they decided to cripple the whole thing with an insane firing system that uses a single key for both shots and bombs. No big deal - other adaptations do the same - but here the "bombs" don't actually fall from your ship; instead they drop a few pixels and disappear. This makes it nearly impossible to hit the fuel tanks you need to keep going, and the strategic bombing needed to hit enemies while navigating those caverns is hellishly difficult. Since we're not talking about system limitations like Atari 2600 player/missile graphics I can't imagine the reasoning for this, beyond the fact calculating the bomb's fall path must have been more than they could/wanted to deal with. A shame after so much effort to get much of the rest of this game right.
Digout (B)
A decent unofficial port of Dig-Dug that looks a bit clunky and lacks a few flourishes, but captures most of the spirit of the original when it comes to gameplay. You guide a pumpman who tunnels through the underground screens, destroying bad guys by pumping them full of air until they explode or by dropping rocks on them. The two types of enemies will occasionally morph through the soil like the original and the dragons - if that's what they are - breath fire at you (and here they do so vertically as well as horizontally). There's no bonuses to collect after dropping multiple rocks and the playfield resets itself after you die (but not the enemies remaining). The "pump" graphics are a little awkward, leading to some early deaths as I was unclear on what was happening, but one gets used to them pretty quickly.
Formula 1 (C-)
Oh, the frustration - I really wanted to like this Pole Position-type racer. It offers first-class presentation, six selectable tracks, a user-selectable number of laps, good graphics for the VZ200, and a simple and logical control scheme. But it suffers from one problem that will cause you to bail out within the first few times (if not the first) you encounter it. Basically, if you crash on a very sharp turn it's nearly impossible to get restarted because you can't redirect or reposition your car before accelerating - so all you do is drive into the barrier again perhaps a pixel's length down the road. This can happen literally dozens of times before you hit a straighter stretch. If not for this it'd be one of the system's highest-rated games; as it is the only reason it rates this high is because it shows the potential of the machine.
Galactic Invasion (C-)
There's a pretty good Demon Attack/Megamania-type shooter in here just itching to get out, but an incredible flicker problem involving enemy shots make this title impossible to enjoy. Aliens appear at the top of the screen, attacking in various horizontal and vertical patterns - always a good start for a simple shooter. But their missiles seem to be visible perhaps one-third of the time, so one that's well above you may cause your destruction when it reappears. Maybe it's done to speed things up on a slow machine, but it renders the game to the scrap heap unless you really like this sort of genre.
Galaxon (C+)
A simple port of Galaxians that gets a lot of basics right, such as decent graphics and playing speed, but also misses in key ways. The biggest is a complete lack of variety in enemy attacks. They descend at 45-degree angles and bound off the screen edges like balls in Breakout. This makes games rather predictable. Also, if you die at the wrong time this can result in your being trapped in a nearly impossible situation when your next ship appears at the left edge of the screen. One of those games you wish the programmer had spent just a bit of extra time with.
Ghostblasters (D+)
I've played worse arcade games written in BASIC, but nobody's ever going to mistake this for a commercial-quality release (even though it seems to be derived from part of the top-selling "Ghostbusters" game on other platforms at the time). Based on the movie, the player tries to capture ghosts that move overhead by shooting them Missile Command style, sort-of. The "sort-of" refers to relying on the long laser-like lines that intercept the intruder. At the right and left edges of the bottom of the screen are your supposed "helpers," but all they really do is make the game nearly impossible because they fire "streams" at the same time as yours, and if they get "crossed" the game is over. The problem is this will probably happen on any missed shot, since everyone fires at a 45-degree angle (your player's shots are controlled by which direction he's facing), and even on accurate ones where the ghost is high enough on the screen that shots cross under him. The action is typical for BASIC, with the ghost "jumping" rather than moving around the screen, more or less at random, and rather sluggish overall gameplay. The author gets credit for providing instructions and selectable keyboard/joystick controls.
Ghost Hunter (B+)
A pretty good unofficial port of Pac-Man, although the "mediocre elsewhere, good here" curve applies. The maze is reasonably close to the coin-op and the monsters move intelligently enough to bear a similar resemblance. The gameplay differences are minor - the entire screen switches colors when a power pill is eaten, flashing a few times before returning to normal, and the center prize is always what appears to be a heart. The speed is good and difficulty increases at a reasonable pace. A "hacked" version commonly found on the Web lets players select the number of men and starting wave.
Grave Digger (D+)
Imagine Lode Runner or Space Panik as a really slow turn-based strategy game and you may get a good idea about this one. It seems like variations of this type of puzzler were making the BASIC rounds on computers at the time; the best were interesting in a Minesweeper sort of way. In this one the player (a capital "O") moves around a screen filled with obstacles ("+" signs) by typing in directions (N, S, W, E). After each turn the enemies ("X") move one space in his direction. The player can fight back by making good use of the obstacles and digging a limited number of graves that enemies can fall into. This is a below-average variation mostly because of a clunky user interface. It's very slow and the game display scrolls off screen every time it asks the player to type in a move and whether they want to dig a grave. I'd be proud of this as a beginning programmer if this was my first complete game, but too many other similar programs offer more interesting and faster-paced challenges.
(Note from editor: Look for more VZ200 reviews next month.)
| Game Over |
Well, another issue is in the can. Thanks for sticking with us all these months, and we hope you'll join us again next month for another issue of the longest-running free online gaming newsletter.
- Adam King, Chief Editor
Copyright © 2005 Adam King & Alan Hewston. All related copyrights and trademarks are acknowledged.